Talk about “keeping up with the Joneses.”
A Georgia House committee on Monday voted to move single operator a monopoly.
While a 20% tax rate won’t keep operators out of a state, it’s considered high. At least a dozen states with legal sports betting have tax rates of 15% or less.
The subject of sports betting has been bandied about in Georgia since late 2019, when local pro teams, including the MLB Atlanta Braves, NFL Atlanta Falcons, and NBA Atlanta Hawks, banded together in of legalization. The result is a bill that would allow for statewide mobile wagering with remote registration and betting on professional sports only. The bill would allow professional sports teams to partner with operators and includes a mandate for operators to purchase official league data. The Georgia Lottery would be the regulator, and according to the original text of the bill, a minimum of six licenses would be issued.
Minority participation a key discussion point 3z2z3c
Monday’s hearing was short, only about half an hour. Stephens fielded questions about minority participation and about a proposed “needs-based” amendment that was not added to the bill. According to multiple representatives, the section of the bill that addresses minority participation is outdated.
“The minority participation language placed in there is from 1992,” said Rep. Winfred Dukes. “Is it not true that many of us would like it to reflect 2021?”
Said Rep. Miriam Paris: “Minority participation is very important to us, but the lack of language in this bill is of concern to us. We’re not getting our fair share and we are participating heavily with the Lottery. This isn’t beating a dead horse, this horse is alive and kicking.”
Legalizing sports betting could divert an estimated $4.8 billion a year Georgians now spend wagering on games illegally, tax it, and put a portion of the proceeds toward education, ers said.https://t.co/Te2iCXeijA
— Rome News Tribune (@romenewstribune) February 21, 2021
Stephens responded to his fellow lawmakers by saying that any new language with regard to minority participation would be in conflict with current Georgia Lottery rules and would require a constitutional amendment, which would delay legalization by several years. He did promise that, once the bill had ed committee, he would continue the discussion on minority participation going forward.
Stephens also fielded questions from Rep. Robert Pruitt, who wanted the bill to include some sort of language mandating that operators build headquarters in the state or that it require some other way to keep dollars generated from the business of sports betting in the state. Stephens didn’t really address that question, other than to say that the best way for the state to capture some revenue is through the proposed increased tax rate. Sports betting tax revenue would be earmarked for education.
Legislative deadline approaching 6n255u
The Georgia General Assembly is in session until April 2, and the legislative deadline for a bill to out of its originating chamber is the 28th day of the session. Monday was the 21st day. The bill will now be sent to the Rules Committee, and should it there, it would go to the House Floor for a vote.
SB 142, which is similar in content to HB 86, had a hearing in the Regulated Industries and Utilities Committee last week. The two bills differ in that the Senate version calls for a 10% tax rate and would allow wagering s to be funded with both credit and debit cards, while the House bill now calls for the 20% tax rate and would now only allow debit cards to be used. Regardless of that provision, financial institutions in most cases will not permit purchases associated with gambling.
Both bills seek to eliminate the need for a constitutional amendment by expanding the powers of the Georgia Lottery. A constitutional amendment wouldn’t go on the ballot in Georgia until 2022.
